Have you ever submitted your writing for a critique? I have - both through the Romantic Novelists Association and via an authors' advisory service. Last week, I posted a blog called What I Learned From All That Editing. This week, I thought I'd do the same with critiques.
The single most important thing I believe about critiques is that if you are happy to accept the praise, then you should also swallow the criticism and take it seriously. You can't have it both ways. I was once at a meeting in which a fellow writer had just received her RNA report and naturally she was revelling in the positive comments; but when she was asked about the advice she had been given to improve her book, she became rather sniffy and said her reader hadn't appreciated certain aspects of her novel. Sorry, love, it doesn't work like that. If you want the praise, you have to take the criticism too.
Which brings me to my second point. Some criticism is hard to take. When you've poured your heart and soul into your writing, it hurts to have someone pick holes in it. My advice would be to set the report aside - and don't return to it until you know you are ready to give it your full consideration. Chances are the reviewer was right. Chances are that this is your opportunity to learn something. Even if you end up disagreeing with the reader, it is essential, for the sake of your development as a writer, that you think seriously about what s/he says.
Are you suprised that I've gone from "Take criticism on the chin" to "If you end up disagreeing"? Well, it's true - you might end up disagreeing with your reader - the operative words being end up, meaning that you have given the point proper consideration. Here's an example. I once received a reader's report in which my reader took great exception to something my MC did.
"The heroine of a romantic novel cannot possibly do this. There's another character in the scene - let her do it."
Well, yes, the other character could have done it, because she too had a reason - but my heroine did what she did to protect her child and I decided that if she didn't take this action, not only would she be weaker as a character, but the scene would have less impact and the book as a whole would be weaker.
Because my final point is this - it's your book. It's your decision what you do with it. Yes, pay attention to the critique. Learn from it. A good critique will give you ideas to develop your book fully. A good critique can be of enormous benefit - even if parts of it are hard to read first time round. But ultimately it's up to you, the writer, to write your book in the best and most effective way you can.
Have you been helped by having your work critiqued? What is the best piece of advice you can pass on? |
Make A Comment
Comments (6)
Jessica xx
I've learned so much from the RNA NWS critiques as well as RWA contest feedback and wouldn't be where I am as a writer without having taken that feedback on board. Yes, some of it was hard to hear but in the end it helped me grow and work on weaker areas of craft.
In even less valuable critiques, I've usually found a kernel of truth because those who critique are also readers and if something takes a reader out of the story, I should pay attention to it.
One final point...the RNA NWS critiques prepared me well for my first round of editor's revisions.